December 31
January 2
Cargo 200
January 7
Silent Light
January 9
How About You
Yonkers Joe
January 16
Cherry Blossoms
January 21
Of Time and the City
John Cusack has been in 50 films so far, and out of these, he tells the Guardian's Ryan Gilbey, ten have been "good." I would say it's more like twelve -- The Sure Thing, Eight Men Out, Say Anything, The Grifters, Bullets Over Broadway, Grosse Pointe Blank, Con Air, The Thin Red Line, Being John Malkovich, High Fidelity, 1408 and Grace is Gone. (I haven't seen Martian Child, but isn't that supposed to be reasonably decent as well? Maybe not.)

On top of which Max, Identity and Pushing Tin weren't half bad also, and Cusack had a tiny part in Broadcast News also. So let's make it 15 or 16. To be genuinely or somewhat proud with slightly less than a third of the films you've made over the last 24 years is, I think, a pretty good track record.
Put in perspective, this is a better percentage than Kirk Douglas managed to rack up over the course of his 89-film career.
Douglas said almost the exact same thing to me in a chat we had in '82 -- "I've made a lot of crap but I've made a pretty fair number of good ones also, and that ain't bad." By my count, Douglas made 17 films that are either good, very good or classic-level -- Out of the Past, A Letter to Three Wives, Champion, Young Man With a Horn, The Glass Menagerie, Ace in the Hole, Detective Story, The Big Sky, The Bad and the Beautiful, Lust for Life, Paths of Glory, The Vikings (love that film!), The Devil's Disciple, Spartacus, Two Weeks in Another Town, Lonely Are The Brave and Seven Days in May. And they were made over a 17 year run ('47 to '64).
Cusack started earlier (he was 16 or 17 when he made Class) while Douglas's career didn't really get going until he was pushing 30, but Cusack is nonetheless batting about .300 while Douglas's lifetime average is less than .200.
Until fifteen minutes ago I had never once analogized Cusack and Douglas. I don't think anyone else has either, and I doubt if anyone ever will again. But they've both tried very hard (when at all possible) to be in films of quality, and they've done better than most in this respect.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on September 1, 2007 at 5:40 AM
comment #1
jjgittes
says ...
There's a great movie somewhere in "City Hall" but it doesn't even quite get to the good movie category for me. A real missed opportunity on that one.
"Identity" is not "not half bad", it's quite bad.
Posted by jjgittes
at September 1, 2007 6:44 AM
comment #2
renorambler
says ...
Cusack is an intensly likable actor but he is in that phase of his career that he needs to shift into more diverse roles in front of and behind the camera. He's well aware of this as you can see from some of his later work. Since he's not a typical leading man type of guy I'm glad he is exploring projects like Max (which I found to be quite good).
Posted by renorambler
at September 1, 2007 6:48 AM
comment #3
Rob
says ...
Replace Con Air with Better Off Dead and you're onto something.
Posted by Rob
at September 1, 2007 6:50 AM
comment #4
NDH
says ...
I always thought "The Journey of Natty Gann" was a terrific and grossly underrated picture, and Cusack does a great job in one of his very early roles. And of course there's "Stand By Me," but I guess that doesn't count as the man is only in it for a few seconds. Either way, this guy has had a solid career.
Posted by NDH
at September 1, 2007 6:53 AM
comment #5
PerfectTommy
says ...
I've always loved Douglas' "The War Wagon"; probably because it is the first film I remember seeing in a theater. But I've gone back to it many times and still enjoy it. "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" is a clasic of its time and "The Strange Loves of Martha Ivers" and "In Harms Way" are also films of distinction.
And yet, I think in Cusacks short career he has made almost as many great films as Douglas. I'd put "Being John" and "Anything" at the top of the list, though "Gross Point" is really a kick.
Posted by PerfectTommy
at September 1, 2007 6:53 AM
comment #6
MDOC
says ...
I'm a huge fan Better Off Dead and One Crazy Summer.
Posted by MDOC
at September 1, 2007 7:02 AM
comment #7
alynch
says ...
I'd include "There Was A Crooked Man..." among Douglas's good films, but other than that, I agree with you.
Posted by alynch
at September 1, 2007 7:07 AM
comment #8
erniesouchak
says ...
Come one, you can't put "Broadcast News" on the list -- he has a split-second walk-on and his back is to the camera! Geez.
I also think that more than a few of those movies have been good in spite of Cusack's presence, not because of it. "The Grifters" is certainly a case in point.
Posted by erniesouchak
at September 1, 2007 7:10 AM
comment #9
vanhammersly
says ...
Con Air? Really? Love Cusack, but "Con Air" is a huge, ridiculous, steaming pile of dog turd. Cusack's best films (in order) are: Say Anything, High Fidelity, The Sure Thing, Grosse Pointe Blank, The Grifters, Eight Men Out, Being John Malkovich, Bullets Over Broadway, The Thin Red Line.
Posted by vanhammersly
at September 1, 2007 7:47 AM
comment #10
alynch
says ...
Con Air is one of the best examples of goofy fun in recent years.
Posted by alynch
at September 1, 2007 7:51 AM
comment #11
Mark B
says ...
I know he only had a small role in this one but I would add SIXTEEN CANDLES to the "good" (but not great) list as well. Any "great" list has to be limited to films of the caliber of SAY ANYTHING. He should've been Oscar nominated for that one.
Posted by Mark B
at September 1, 2007 8:29 AM
comment #12
siamesecat
says ...
No list of Douglas greats would be complete without HOLOCAUST 2000. Well, *I* liked it anyway.
Posted by siamesecat
at September 1, 2007 8:31 AM
comment #13
Filipe
says ...
So Wells, went to IMDb, saw the number 89 and forget to cut the TV shows episodes Douglas did. Actually if one cuts all the TV work Douglas did, one would be down to 74 films, which would made pretty close to the Wells Cusack count.
Posted by Filipe
at September 1, 2007 9:51 AM
comment #14
The Movie Man
says ...
I thought The Ice Harvest was underrated and contained Cusack's best work in some time, for what that's worth. Interesting post.
Posted by The Movie Man
at September 1, 2007 10:01 AM
comment #15
J. Huff
says ...
Sadly, Cusack doesn't appreciate his ability to make a joy some lighter-than-air romances (like Serendipity) and some amazingly funny comedies (his work with Savage Steve Holland). I've always loved his work and give him more credit than he gives himself. This article is fascinating, especially considering that Cusack radiates a bit of that Edward Norton "I really am smarter than you" vibe. (Love Norton's work too, but that's another story.) Cusack's intellect may make it impossible to admit that some of his work that paid the bills really is better because of him...but then again, perhaps it would be best not to stroke the potential for a raging ego.
Posted by J. Huff
at September 1, 2007 10:02 AM
comment #16
Balthazar
says ...
I'm a big John Cusack fan. Say Anything will always be his signature film for me.
That said, I agree with most of the thoughts above.
I would never call Con-Air a great film, but it's probably in my Top 3 list of guilty pleasures. Just a fun film and that's OK sometimes, right?
Speaking of fun, I don't think my wife and I had a better experience in the theatre this summer than 1408, although I left with a severely bruised forearm. We were quite pleased with how totally off-guard the thrills and chills caught us.
Posted by Balthazar
at September 1, 2007 10:07 AM
comment #17
George Prager
says ...
Strike HIGH FIDELITY. Add BETTER OFF DEAD.
Especially the horror movie version:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=eipq4zAVRGI
Posted by George Prager
at September 1, 2007 10:18 AM
comment #18
Larry
says ...
Forget batting average. Slugging percentage is what counts, and Kirk Douglas hit home runs, while most of Cusack's good films are singles or doubles.
And Eight Men Out, Say Anything, The Grifters, Grosse Pointe Blank, Con Air, The Thin Red Line and 1408 range from passable to bad. They're all overrated except Con Air--I wasn't aware anyone thought much of it.
Posted by Larry
at September 1, 2007 10:51 AM
comment #19
The Movie Man
says ...
Let's go ahead and just say it: Cameron Crowe ages poorly. Say Anything, something I used to love, IS overrated. I'm not sure if Singles was liked to begin with, but if it was, it would also qualify as overrated, ditto Jerry Maguire. Vanilla Sky and Elizabthetown don't qualify because no one liked them to begin with.
I give the man Almost Famous, and he's talented, but he needs to drop the pie in the sky, awe of your true love connection crap and acknowledge just a hint of the real world if he wishes to get relevant again.
Posted by The Movie Man
at September 1, 2007 11:18 AM
comment #20
Balthazar
says ...
Oh, I have to respectfully disagree on Crowe. His best films do NOT age poorly. ... Say Anything remains a terrific film. Great script and terrific acting (I also find myself wishing Mahoney could get a retroactive Supporting Actor nomination for his great work in that film). Jerry Maguire suffered a bit from pieces of the film being sucked into the pop culture and therefore being overexposed. But it's a great film, too, as is Almost Famous. ... Singles was never a great film, IMO, so I can't say it ages poorly. It is what it is.
Posted by Balthazar
at September 1, 2007 12:03 PM
comment #21
The Winchester
says ...
After reading these posts, I truly feel Cusack should reteam with both Savage Steve Holland and Cameron Crowe.
Not on the same movie, obviously.
(Although that would be a very interesting movie).
I also have to second the opinion of The Ice Harvest as being underrated. But Platt steals that movie from everybody.
And Identity felt like "The 3" script from Adaptation come to life.
Posted by The Winchester
at September 1, 2007 12:18 PM
comment #22
MiraJeffAICN
says ...
Ice Harvest was tedious and 14-8 was half of a good movie.
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at September 1, 2007 12:31 PM
comment #23
Lee
says ...
No one else thinks RUNAWAY JURY ranks with Cusack's good-not-great entertainments? Film's a bit mechanical, but has his likable, intelligent, earnest qualities displayed well.
Posted by Lee
at September 1, 2007 1:12 PM
comment #24
The Movie Man
says ...
Balthazar: I may disagree about the movie, but I'm definitely with you on Mahoney in Say Anything, wonderful performance.
Posted by The Movie Man
at September 1, 2007 2:33 PM
comment #25
jeffmcm
says ...
Runaway Jury has a good cast, but it's completely disposable, like all of Gary Fleder's hacktastic films.
Posted by jeffmcm
at September 1, 2007 2:49 PM
comment #26
lipranzer
says ...
Sad to say, but EIGHT MEN OUT doesn't hold up for me either, and I say that as a die-hard John Sayles fan. Although Cusack was pretty good in it.
Of course, I have to disagree with Larry and The Movie Man over Say Anything; I think it's one of his best.
Also, Ernie, do you mean to say he's bad in THE GRIFTERS, or that he's overshadowed by the other two leads? Cause if it's the latter, you may have a point (certainly, it's one of Bening's best performances), but if it's the former, I disagree. As Peter Rainer pointed out, Cusack's is the only performance in the movie that isn't a take-off on a classic noir character, and it's his first "adult" leading role, which he handled quite nicely, I thought.
As for underrated movies, he doesn't have a big part in MAP OF THE HUMAN HEART, but that's an interesting (albeit not entirely successful). As for guilty pleasure movies, for me, you can forget CON AIR (junk, and I HATED his rationale for doing it), cause it's TAPEHEADS all the way. It's a silly movie, but it's fun silly, and he and Tim Robbins are clearly having a blast.
Posted by lipranzer
at September 1, 2007 9:16 PM
Post a comment