Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Cloverfield [BLU-RAY] (Paramount Home Entertainment, 6.3.2008) Disguised under deliberately goofy, yet deliciously edible-sounding, aliases such as Cheese and Slusho, Matt Reeves' Cloverfield was produced and rushed into theaters under an equally appetizing shroud of secrecy. From last year's incredibly elusive Super Bowl ad to the film's viral marketing campaign, Cloverfield had everybody scratching their heads and drooling in anticipation. Aside from the as-yet untitled title and the Blair Witch-ian visual style, the film's biggest appeal was the enigmatic creature who was last (un)seen hurling the decapitated head of the Statue of Liberty onto the crowded streets of New York City. All we knew about the mysterious beast was that it was big and angry. Now that the highy-anticipated project has come and gone, one question has fortunately been answered: Cloverfield was a major success. (continued)

Upcoming

November 12

Slumdog Millionaire

November 14

A Christmas Tale

B.O.H.I.C.A.

Dostana

The Dukes

Eden

House of the Sleeping Beauties

How About You

Quantum of Solace

We are Wizards

November 21

The Betrayal

Bolt

Special

Twilight

November 30

Badland








"Whether I like it or

"Whether I like it or not, or whether anybody else does, when I start a film I have a few ideas," Gilliam tells Hart in the same piece. "And as you're getting into it, you think, 'Ooh, there's another idea,' and you're shooting some more and, 'Oh, here's another thing. Let's do that.' I'm always changing and adding. That's just the way my mind works." And that's pretty much why, I gather, Gilliam's The Brother Grimm (Miramax, 8.26) feels like such a hyper crazy-quilt thing. It's imaginative, all right, but Gilliam throws it all together in such scattershot fashion that his ideas begin to feel like flies you'd like to swat with a rolled-up magazine. Variety's Robert Koehler says Grimm is filled with "cumbersome action set pieces that are neither quite fairy-tale fanciful nor convincingly real...it's this in-between-ness, along with Gilliam's numbing use of filming with ultra wide-angle lenses that turn [it] into the director's glummest and most visually clunky production."

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 21, 2005 at 9:47 AM

Post a comment